Comments on: Infinite Number of Undetectable Designer Steroids with Combinatorial Chemistry http://www.steroidreport.com/2008/08/22/combinatorial-chemistry-undetectable-designer-steroids/ Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:14:25 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Luxury Car Seat http://www.steroidreport.com/2008/08/22/combinatorial-chemistry-undetectable-designer-steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-894 Luxury Car Seat Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:10:14 +0000 http://www.steroidreport.com/?p=236#comment-894 You don't need to know its exact chemical structure to conclude that it shouldn't be there! Of course the way you defeat this test is to dope with a naturally occurring compound. You don't need to know its exact chemical structure to conclude that it shouldn't be there! Of course the way you defeat this test is to dope with a naturally occurring compound. ]]> By: PalmGerald http://www.steroidreport.com/2008/08/22/combinatorial-chemistry-undetectable-designer-steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-893 PalmGerald Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:40:50 +0000 http://www.steroidreport.com/?p=236#comment-893 I do not really trust such a The truth is that fat is a calories deposit. In order to get rid of that fat you have to burn out the calories. A sleeping program might regulate your body's activities but only old fashion diet and a lot of exercise will actually burn that extra fat. I do not really trust such a The truth is that fat is a calories deposit. In order to get rid of that fat you have to burn out the calories. A sleeping program might regulate your body's activities but only old fashion diet and a lot of exercise will actually burn that extra fat. ]]> By: Club Penguin Cheats http://www.steroidreport.com/2008/08/22/combinatorial-chemistry-undetectable-designer-steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-876 Club Penguin Cheats Sun, 20 Sep 2009 03:19:47 +0000 http://www.steroidreport.com/?p=236#comment-876 You don't need to know its exact chemical structure to conclude that it shouldn't be there! Of course the way you defeat this test is to dope with a naturally occurring compound. You don't need to know its exact chemical structure to conclude that it shouldn't be there! Of course the way you defeat this test is to dope with a naturally occurring compound. ]]> By: WADA Funds False Consensus Effect Study to Catch Dopers | Steroid Report http://www.steroidreport.com/2008/08/22/combinatorial-chemistry-undetectable-designer-steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-603 WADA Funds False Consensus Effect Study to Catch Dopers | Steroid Report Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:40:11 +0000 http://www.steroidreport.com/?p=236#comment-603 [...] are faced with several emerging doping methods such as synthetic blood doping, gene doping and designer steroids created via dynamic combinatorial chemistry [...] [...] are faced with several emerging doping methods such as synthetic blood doping, gene doping and designer steroids created via dynamic combinatorial chemistry [...] ]]> By: Anon http://www.steroidreport.com/2008/08/22/combinatorial-chemistry-undetectable-designer-steroids/comment-page-1/#comment-611 Anon Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:30:11 +0000 http://www.steroidreport.com/?p=236#comment-611 google on "designer steroid detection" and follow the first link:<br><a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1402217">http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender....</a><br><br>Their method extracts anything that binds specifically to androgen receptors and then applies conventional GC/MS analysis. Any peak that does not match known endogenous compounds (e.g. testosterone) is, by definition, a non-natural androgen-receptor-binding compound. You don't need to know its exact chemical structure to conclude that it shouldn't be there! Of course the way you defeat this test is to dope with a naturally occurring compound. But it should detect "designer" steroids of all kinds, both known and unknown, as well as SARMS. No? google on “designer steroid detection” and follow the first link:
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender….

Their method extracts anything that binds specifically to androgen receptors and then applies conventional GC/MS analysis. Any peak that does not match known endogenous compounds (e.g. testosterone) is, by definition, a non-natural androgen-receptor-binding compound. You don't need to know its exact chemical structure to conclude that it shouldn't be there! Of course the way you defeat this test is to dope with a naturally occurring compound. But it should detect “designer” steroids of all kinds, both known and unknown, as well as SARMS. No?

]]>