You are here: Home / Steroid Commentary / War on Steroids Versus War on Drugs
Millard Baker is the founder and editor of MESO-Rx.com, a website that provides information on the medical and non-medical uses of anabolic-androgenic steroids. He also writes about anabolic steroids and performance enhancing drugs and their use and impact in sport and society.




War on Steroids Versus War on Drugs
I previously reported how the federal expenditures for the war on steroids and congressional steroid investigations have come at the expense of slashing programs used in the traditional war on drugs.
The feds are spending more and more taxpayer money pursuing steroid-related investigations while at the same time cutting funding for narcotic-related investigations (via Byrne task force investigations). Grits for Breakfast responded by pointing out how the Byrne task force programs had no meaningful effect on public safety (“Byrne task force funds mainly financing low-grade drug enforcement,” March 10).
I’ve since been following Grits for Breakfast’s excellent coverage of the Bryne funding cuts; Grits has concluded the funding cuts are a good thing (“Hyping Harm: Media should welcome, not decry cuts to federal Byrne grant program,” April 2).
Let’s hope that taxpayers, the media and bureacrats start to ask critical questions about whether the government’s newest drug war, the war on steroids, is having any demonstrable effect of public safety or public health (or even integrity in sports); hopefully we can avoid wasting any further funds on another failed experiment targeting low level personal users of anabolic steroids that have negligible effects on public safety.
Related Articles
Unintended Consequences of War on Athletes Using Anabolic Steroids
Steroid Investigations and Trash Collection
Lance Armstrong vs. Anti-Doping Movement: Who Is Really Defrauding the Government?
Focus on Steroids Overshadows More Widely Used Drugs in High Schools
David Soares is a Political Fraud Basking in Publicity of Steroid Scandal